Monday, 6 February 2012

#15: 'Gay Best Friends'


-A lot of people – particularly (but not exclusively) girls who garnered their ideals of modern womanhood and femininity from watching Sex and the City box sets – delight at the idea of having what they call a ‘gay best friend’.
-If they have not acquired one, they will warble to you, with an Americanized intonation that goes up at the end of their sentence, aping Cher from Clueless, Phoebe from Friends and the entire cast of Made in Chelsea, that they wish they ‘had a gay best friee-end’.
-If they have already acquired one, they will tell you about all the fun stuff they do with their ‘gay best friee-end’, such as spending all day in their pajamas watching trashy movies, staying up all night reading vogue and shoe blogs, bitching and, most importantly, going ‘shawping’.
-They tend not to think about the fact that commoditizing a person because of their sexual preferences is definitely not something that friends do to one another. At least, I try not to categorize my friends that way. Among my circle of chums there could potentially be some pretty unseemly epithets; ‘BFFWLGR’ (BFF Who Likes Getting Rimmed).
-However, this is not about niche sexual practices. It’s got more to do with minority groups and cultural stereotypes. The ‘gay best friend’ idea perpetuates the fallacy that, in order to be accepted into the narrow margins of mainstream heteronormative culture, homosexual men have to talk like Truman Capote, dress fashionably, and gesticulate senselessly, whilst declaring everything as ‘faaaabulous’. Those are the good little gays we like to see, apparently. This is why representation of gay men in the media doesn’t stretch far beyond the realms of Graham Norton and Alan Carr. It seems there is far less space in the popular consciousness for gay men who don’t wear their ‘otherness’ as flamboyantly as their Vivien Westwood man-bags. Would the kinds of people who yearn for a ‘gay best frie-eeend’ want, quite as much, to be friends with a man who works in carphone warehouse, likes reading crime novels, listens to Classic FM and happens also to be openly gay? Not tho thure, thweetie.
-And what about ‘lesbian best friends’? I don’t hear of many of them knocking around. Is that because, once again, stereotypes come into play, and the fictional image we have of big, scary, frumpy, aggressive lesbians is less appealing than that of ‘fun’ gay men, for whom life is apparently just one big bitch-athon?
-As far as I can tell, the pressure for gay men to pander to campy stereotypes is something that is embedded in the landscape of mainstream heterosexual culture, and may take a long time to change. It’s like, “we’ve just about accepted that there are people out there who don’t do the kind of love it says to do in The Bible, but we will only accept the ones who amuse and appease us by behaving in a non-threatening, non-‘manly’ fashion. And as for the women who engage in such tomfoolery… Well, they’d better be as funny as Ellen Degeneris, or as smoking hot as her girlfriend, or we shall have no truck with them whatsoever.”
-But, back to the whinge about ‘gay best friends’. Basically, the popular appeal of the ‘gay best friend’ thing is unconsciously based on a patronizing presupposition that homosexual men are cute and cuddly, naturally effeminate and devoid of sexual agency, and must therefore enjoy living vicariously through people with ‘proper’ heterosexual love lives. Basically, the human equivalent of a Chihuahua poking out of an Hermès Berkin. It’s as crass and tokenistic as the idea of having an ‘Asian best friend’, or a ‘black ex-partner’ as opposed to all your other best friends and ex-partners. Much the same as Asians, black people and all your other best friends, non-heterosexuals are capable of possessing an identity that is not informed by cultural stereotypes, and if befriended, should just be referred to as ‘friends’.

Tuesday, 24 January 2012

#14: People who show you 'cool stuff!!!' on Youtube


-The internet is a double-edged sword.
-On one hand, the internet and has presented us with many wonderful opportunities for expanding our opinions, outlook and general knowledge, visa vis news and current affairs from multiple sources, The Gutenberg Project and Wikipedia.
-On the other hand, the internet has also presented us with many opportunities to shrink our brains into half eaten, saliva-soaked marshmallows, wasting our time and misinforming us about our world and the people in it, visa vis Miniclip.com, Facebook and, of course, Wikipedia. Not only because a lot of its entries are improperly researched and unverified, but also because of the varying and unaccountable nature of its coverage. The 400 word entry for Elizabeth Smart’s breathtaking 1945 prose poetry masterpiece By Grand Central Station I Sat Down and Wept is pretty measly in comparison to the 6 section mini biography that comprises the entry for Dappy from N-Dubz. Apparently the cunt puts pepper in his toddler’s mouth as a punishment for swearing. He also got kicked out of Alton Towers last year for smoking a joint.
-Anyway, Youtube is a fascinating addition to our brave new world, giving us pop culture on tap, as it were. It’s amazing to have mini documentaries about Leonard Peltier, or trailers from forgotten Italian Giallo films and other groovy little cultural relics at our fingertips. We can even dig around in obscure music genres, listening to whole albums of rare afro-beat and Peruvian surf rock if we so wish.
-It’s less amazing that thousands of halfwits can post almost identical videos of their whippet going ballistic after bathtime and share it with a seemingly indifferent online world.
-The reason I say ‘seemingly indifferent’ is because though I know I don’t give a shit, and you may not either, I am still ceaselessly amazed, and often concerned, by the amount of views and comments that these pieces of audio-visual flim flam seem to gather. Under the soberly titled ‘Funny Dog Video’, posted four years ago by hotgirl5753, there are such insights as;

‘Who says cat videos are the best? FUCK CATS! Dogs can do everything a cat can, they can do more and they can do it better!’ 
- IamEyalMarcosLevit

and,

‘good video is funny :D. Song??’
-McRAEize

The accompanying song was, of course, Who Let the Dogs Out?, released by the Baha Men in the year 2000. Not sure how it managed to slip past the ears of McRAEize, what with it being the most irritating piece of music of all time, but there you go.
-In a weird way, these faceless (and very brainless) comments are really interesting, bringing Roland Barthe’s groundbreaking and diabolically boring thesis on ‘The Death of the Author’ back into relevance, in a poignant, yet totally hopeless format.
-However, the main thing I wanted to moan about is the fact that there are certain people who insist on showing you what they deem as ‘cool stuff!’ on youtube. And unless you have a good reason not to, you end up being subjected to repeatedly viewing a 47 second clip of a baby being surprised, or a cat that walks backwards. The people who seek out and share these videos are the grown up equivalent of the kid in the playground who wasted your whole break-time by describing the entire plot of their favourite Simpsons episode in a non-linear fashion, and I would like them to leave me alone.

Monday, 9 January 2012

#13: Nerdy Cannabis Enthusiasts


 Cannabis enthusiasts Cypress Hill's cameo on The Simpsons.

It’s a hybrid? It’s grown in Southern California? It’s called ‘mango wizzle’? I suppose that's interesting, but I don’t really care. Get me a glass of water because my mouth is extremely dry. And stop giving me a biography of the dope we just smoked, because I’m trying to watch Beverly Hills Ninja. 

-One of my least favourite types of people (though I have very few ‘favourite types of people’) are those who get sucked into the pointless discipline of knowing too much about cannabis – proponents of doob scholarship, if you will.
-It’s not that I hate these people, but I have always found them incredibly dull. No prizes for guessing the major contributing factor.
-Every hobby has its enthusiasts, and there’s a fine line between enthusiasts and nerds. I don’t hate nerds either. In fact, I have always felt very comfortable around them, because I am one. However, nerds do have the habit of bending your ear about stuff you couldn’t care less about, and that can be tremendously irritating - even on an interdisciplinary nerd level; an animé nerd will have no time for the ramblings of a military history nerd. Although there are exceptions, such as the nerd I met working in a sex shop in Soho recently. He was, for all intents and purposes, a total nerd, but his niche interest lay in the area of racy things such as lube, pornography and disconcertingly life-like rubber fists, as opposed to warlocks’ incantations and magical elixirs. This made him, in my eyes at least, something of a crossover. I was more inclined to let him guide me through the glass cabinet of jewel-encrusted male urethra enlargers (they’re like the Cartier bracelets of BDSM apparel), than I would have been if he were showing me a selection of replica Viking fantasy weapons. I also found it interesting that his nerdiness probably gets him laid more than the average man – a bit like Neil Strauss, or the bloke who played Seth Coen in The O.C.
-I will put up with – perhaps even enjoy - someone giving me a whirlwind tour through the (thankfully) unfamiliar territory of aggressive sex gear. But I have much less time for nerdy cannabis enthusiasts, who used to bore my buzz into smithereens when I smoked dope, by mumbling away about the name and gender of the strain, where it came from and how fruity/bubbly/dank it was. Let’s get something straight: even if it is the fruitiest, bubbliest, dankest bud ever, and was grown in Indonesia, that just means it spent a long haul flight wrapped in cling-film and buried deep in some poor guy’s arsehole before it found its way to the Carhartt sticker mosaic on your coffee table.
-The last time I remember smoking dope was on my own a few years go, and I spent about 45 minutes in the mirror, combing my hair into a variety of humorous styles. I no longer take any form of drugs or intoxicants. But I do often find myself cornered by a nerdy cannabis enthusiast, providing me with vital information such as ‘ this is the squidgiest Moroccan hash you’ve ever seen, trust me’. Look pal, I trust you alright, it’s just that I just couldn’t give a flying fuck.
In the words of Peter Tosh, ‘legalize it’ (I suppose).

Friday, 30 December 2011

Lowlights of 2011


Here are The Arbitchuary’s least favourite things about the past year:

-Not getting laid for the whole of January.

-Being shhh’d by a room full of doe-eyed, romantic patriots whilst making facetious remarks during coverage of the royal wedding. I missed the actual ceremony, because I didn’t realize it would be on so early.


-Americans relishing the hi-octane execution of Osama Bin Laden, reminding me that we live in a miserable age where violent resolution of conflict is still celebrated by the majority, and international politics are approached with moralistic overtones akin to those of a Stan Lee comic book.


-Not getting laid for most of February.

-Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, and a host of other cinematic disappointments, such as The Rum Diary and The Tree of Life, which played out like a 140 minute Nokia advert.

-Marlboros costing within the range of £7. It’s been Pall Mall (£5.30, if you’re lucky) for the last six months. Ugh.
 Farewell, old chums!
-The death of Nate Dogg. His soulful baritone crooning provided a fitting soundtrack to my youthful days of marijuana intoxication and hustling Pokemon cards. He will be missed by myself and the rest of the O.G community. 

-The death of Gil Scott Heron, one of my few genuine heroes.

-Being told off for not having heard of Downton Abbey, then being told I was arrogant for not having a television.

-The London riots. A time when people of all races, genders and classes came together and united, in the name of…free trainers?
The thrill of speeding down Portobello Road, one hand on my handlebars and the other on a 999 call, pursued by a faceless mob, was outweighed by the fury I felt, watching my city immolated by hordes of greedy lowlives looking for plasma screens. My then flat in Ladbroke Grove was surrounded by teenagers brandishing makeshift weapons. Thankfully, they weren’t aspirational enough to loot the high-end furniture shop downstairs, and I live to tell the tale.

-Having to pay £15 to watch the re-release of Jurassic Park at a Vue in central London. 2014 prices for 1993 cinema?

-Bob Dylan. Seeing him live for the third time, in Sweden in June, was a disappointment hat-trick. The Tom Waits impression - and total disregard for his fanbase - that he’s adopted into his repertoire, made it the third distinctly average performance of his that I’ve seen.

-The Box, in Soho, being full of Hermès Belt wearing fuckheads every time I’ve been there. It supposed to be a seedy burlesque hideaway. Where are Lemmy and all the tattooed pornstar babes?

-Not being able to get a proper view of 80-year-old Mr Burns impersonator, Rupert Murdoch, being smashed in the face with a novelty cream pie during live televised questioning. However, his crazy wife, Wendi Deng, did not disappoint with her Hundred Hand Slap, learned courtesy of classic Street Fighter character E. Honda.

-The increasingly successful career of Drake. How have we let this cunt become so wealthy and popular?

The last point probably sums it up. That’s where we’re headed for o’twelve; more smug fucks bragging about their money through autotuned vocoders – in and out of the music charts – while the rest of us smoke Pall Malls and kill each other for free Reebok Classics.

...Bye bye, two-thousand-and-eleven!

Sunday, 25 December 2011

#11: Nut Roast

-I am punished annually for my commitment to animal welfare with nut roast, a depressing alternative to Christmas turkey.
-I don't know who came up with this bright idea. Unlike the tasty bird cadaver that everyone else is guzzling, it seems that vegetarians have to put up with a meal that tastes like a Tracker bar swimming in vegetable stock.
-I might as well satiate my appetite by gnawing on the shit-flecked bristles of a toilet brush, for all the enjoyment I get out of Christmas dinner. But I'm thankful for it all the same, and wish Christ a happy birthday.

Monday, 19 December 2011

#10: Santa Hats


She's actually not wearing a Santa hat, but if the 
great Gil Elvgren had wanted to put her in one, this
little lady would have got a free pass. 
Not you, though. 

-I doubt I need to go into too much detail here. They have nothing to do with goodwill, peace on earth, compassion, altruism, or a newborn Christ covered in hay and placenta, which is what Christmas should be all about, if you choose to get on board with it, which I don’t.
-They are most commonly coupled with a can of Super Tennents and a request for spare change, which makes me very sad during winter.
-I’ve never gotten over the discovery that Father Christmas isn’t real, and these hats are an annual pinch of salt in the wound.
-For those who don’t have any irritating, cynical lefties in their lives, you may not be informed once a year that our modern day notions of Santa Claus were invented by the Coca-Cola company in the 1930s as an advertising ploy. It’s a brave move trying to market soda with an elderly, fat, ruddy-faced, bearded man who squeezes into your home at night and messes around with your children’s socks, but I think the people at Coca-Cola are getting by okay.
-Ultimately, Christmas ain’t about getting drunk in red and white hats, throwing tantrums over Marc Jacobs bags or eating a fuck-ton of defenseless turkey. It doesn’t even have to be about Jesus (he was born in September, apparently). If anything, it’s a time to practice universal benevolence and be nice to others, which is something I try to practice every day, and so should you, you cocksuckers. So, with regard to Christmas and its Santa Hats, I’ll refer you to the words of another hat-wearing sellout, Flava Flav, and advise that you ‘don’t believe the hype’.

Monday, 12 December 2011

#9: Tyler The Creator [and the collective hipster love affair with his mediocre music]



-Trendy white guys have decided that Tyler the Creator is the new messiah - or perhaps more aptly, the new anti-Christ - of black music, and that excites them very much.
-I have listened to his album, and though, as an (ultra) trendy white guy I might be breaking from tradition in saying this, I think that Tyler the Creator is a waste of time, and I don’t buy any of it.
-This is not because it’s too violent, or too provocative, or not provocative enough. But because it’s the literal definition of mediocre hip hop music, just with a bit more rape fantasy. And actually, rape fantasy isn’t that fun, especially when deployed by 19 year old boy, with a voice like a larynx replacement, against a monotonous drone that I’m constantly being told is a revolutionary new sound in music production.
-Call me square, but in and among all the mind-numbing mediocrity of the album, I did actually find some of the misogynistic stuff mildly offensive. Maybe I’m getting soft in my early twenties, but it just seemed a bit of an affront to hear the word ‘cunt’ deployed at me every few seconds in such an unimaginative way. Now, in my day, Ol' Dirty Bastard or Eminem could tell a violent, misogynistic fantasy yarn and I’d be all over it like bitches on Kool Keith’s dick. But there’s something about this little Tyler the Creator squirt that doesn’t quite work. I could be slightly tied up in a resentment that the kid’s probably getting laid more than I am (though only marginally more, I reckon). And I’m sure anyone who disagrees with me will try to convince me that my being offended just shows that he’s made his point, and that I ‘just don’t get it, maaan’ (or ‘bruuuv’, depending on what side of the Atlantic we’re on, or more specifically, whether it’s Brooklyn or Dalston). But that line won’t fly with me. I’m not offended because the album is an unexpected and inventive assault on my middle class sensibilities and respect for the fairer sex. I’m offended because, within the context of it’s own…shitness, I suppose – the fact that it isn’t really anchored to any tangible sense of real originality or creativity - the album’s pointless attempts at being abrasive just seem to accentuate how fucking dull the production is overall.
-I also can't stand the fact that English people feel that they are allowed to talk about Tyler & Odd Future Wolf Gang Kill Them All in stylized, 90s hip hop slang, using phrases like, 'word is born', and ending sentences with 'son', as if they are part of the cast of New Jack City, as opposed to having grown up in Gospel Oak and working a Saturday job at the Stussy store in Seven Dials. 

-Anyway, I said it. Tyler the Creator is no big deal. And if any of you Supreme cap-wearing, top button-buttoning, sneaker-collecting, ‘street art’-perpetrating whiteboys try to convince me that OFWGKTA are the new Wu-Tang, or that I’m being a pussy and don’t understand, I promise I’ll shove a pair of Limited edition Air Jordan hi-tops down your throat, son. And then knock ya gurl's boots. Whilst listening to Raekwon.
Paaayce.